Posts Tagged: international


25
Oct 09

[Linkage] Smooooth Sunday

The video is tiight!  Featuring Free from Soulshifters, directed by Chad Ross.  Thanks to Francis for pointing me in the direction :)

The Asian woman/white guy debate will never, ever get old. Sylviek takes on a slightly-crazed lurker who equates the dating choices of some of us ladies with the downfall of the race.  Its this breed of guy that irks me: the (understandably) angry Asian American guys who then translate their emasculation at the hands of the media and society into a general hatred for those of us who date white or even interracially.  And if there’s one thing I hate, its ANY guy who feels entitled to my loyalty ……and my sweet lovin’.

Jude Dizon reflects on the nature of unpaid “women’s work” in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.  Its always cool to hear/read about the experiences of conscientious folks in SE Asia (especially cos I get to say that I know him!).  I spend way too much time bitching about the dumb asses invading our continent, so this here’s a piece that I’m actually proud to link to.

LA City Attorney Carmen Trutanich seeks to criminalize suspected taggers for… hanging out? From the LA Times: “If you want to tag, be prepared to go to jail. And I don’t have to catch you tagging. I can just catch you . . . with your homeboys.”  Going tough on crime = throwing more young people behind bars.  I guess its a win-win situation for Trutanich: he appears to be doing something and gets to avoid the less glorified but more important task of like, actually helping young people.

The San Francisco Arts Commission is commissioning artists to display their work on abandoned storefronts as part of the Art in Storefronts Project.  It combats the vacancy blight while enlivening the “aesthetic appearance of the street.”  Pretty cool.  But what’s with the psychedelic eyes?  Why wolves?  Well… I s’pose this is San Francisco, where hippie art will always prevail.

And below, 2 pieces in a series by ghostpatrol.  Makes me wanna kick back on my hammock (if I had one), light up and CHILL.

among dreams

summon stance


19
Oct 09

What others called a crime, I called justice.


Lifted from Just Seeds Artist Cooperative.

This post isn’t about Phoolan Devi, but I liked the poster cos– unlike most of our Western portrayals of poor Asian women who experience sexual violence– it actually looks at (and honors) one of the many women who’ve fought back.  And not by killing herself or falling into someone else’s protective embrace, as the movies might have us believe.

textingI recently came across this photography blog, and needless to say its disgusting.  There’s probably a more tactful way to put it, but really, I think that’s the most appropriate description.

Some background: this guy lives in Thailand and he takes photos, mostly of women, most of whom are sex workers.  His work has been featured in the Telegraph.  He posts pics and shares his thoughts on the lives of his subjects, sex tourists, Thai culture, women… you get the idea.  While he does exhibit a certain sympathy for the women he photographs, let’s not give him too much credit.  His stance is typically patronizing and goes something like this: these poor girls have to sell their bodies, sex tourists are creepy assholes, but I, I respect and understand these women… which is why I take many, many pictures of them and comment on their every thought and move.

But this isn’t even about one guy, cos he’s not that unique. This alternately pitying and condemning yet lusty fascination with sex workers is well documented by like, every guy that’s visited Asia with a camera and access to the internet.  Discussion ranges from unabashedly idiotic (THESE SLUTS ARE FUCKIN CRAZY!!!!!) to high-minded bitching (these poor, desensitized souls..) to a stealthy combination of both (see above example).  There are also some critical voices in the mix, but they’re vastly outnumbered by the more obnoxious ones with racy photographs.

So what’s up with this (one-way) voyeuristic love affair?  Somehow the Asian sex worker is there for endless consumption: to fuck, analyze and/or save (all at the same time, if you’re feeling ambitious).  Conveniently, she’s downtrodden or driven only by money– and accepts her fate graciously.  There’s also the favorite villain for everything that’s wrong with our people, The Asian Man.

And can I just say that my point isn’t that sex work should be kept on the DL, or that Asian men haven’t taken part in the exploitation and subjugation of the ladies.  My issue is with the selective portrayal of women in this profession and the societies that they live in.  It pities, preaches, and cops a feel–but doesn’t go so far as to respect the women and the work that they do.  It focuses on the crimes of her countrymen, but fails to recognize that it’s the crimes of Western powers (I believe “globalization” is the fashionable word) that have led to the creation of such extreme gaps in power and wealth in the rest of the world.  It loves to save, but doesn’t notice that women have been saving themselves ever since the need arose.

So on that note… I’ll end this really long entry with a quote from Empower Foundation, a coalition of sex workers in Thailand who are infinitely more worthy of time and respect than the assholes that clog up the Internet with their “observations”…

“We are sex workers.  We are workers who use our brains and our skill to earn an income.  We are proud to support ourselves and our extended families.  We look after each other at work; we fight for safe & fair standards in our industry and equal rights within society.  We are a major part of the Thai economy, bringing in lots of tourist dollars.  We are active citizens on every issue…politics, economics, environment, laws, rights etc.  We try and find the space in society to stand up and be heard.  Some see us as problem makers but actually we are part of the solution.”


12
Oct 09

Nuclear waste cover-ups…. and pirates.

Last month, the British oil trading company Trafigura announced that it will compensate 31,000 people along the Ivory Coast following their cover-up of one of the worst pollution disasters in recent history.

From the UK Guardian:

…Trafigura knew that the oil slops it sent there in 2006 were contaminated with toxic waste. But the Ivorian contractor it employed to pump out the hold of its tanker dumped them around inhabited areas in the capital city and the countryside. Tens of thousands of people fell ill and 15 died. While the settlement says that the slops could at worst have caused a range of short-term low-level flu-like symptoms, and anxiety, it is one of the world’s worst cases of chemical exposure since the gas leak at the Union Carbide factory in Bhopal. But in all other respects the Trafigura case is unremarkable. It’s just another instance of the rich world’s global fly-tipping.

This news has been reported quietly here in the States.  I guess the slow hand of justice lacks the cinematic thrill that pirates, heroic violence, and high speed rescues offered 4 months ago along that very same coast (in which 3 Somalis were killed, a 4th arrested, and an American was rescued).  That event was covered in a play-by-play media frenzy, with our trusty news bringing light to the apparent lawlessness, greed, and thuggery that plagued our newest (defeated and dismissed) foe.

Back in April, independent news agencies and individuals (along with some lonely voices from national corporate media) went beyond the tabloid coverage to connect nuclear dumping and illegal fishing with the rise in piracy.  Ishaan Thuroor of TIME wrote that “it cost $2.50 per ton for a European company to dump these types of materials off the Horn of Africa, as opposed to $250 per ton to dispose of them cleanly in Europe.”  Somali fishermen complained, brought their case before the UN and were dismissed. What devolved into what is now known as piracy began as a community mobilized against illegal waste in their waters.

So why bitch about it so late in the game?  We’ve got someone to make an example out of, and Trafigura is being served (well, kind of– they’re paying $49 million to victims but denying responsibility).  Case closed.

What little US coverage I’ve found of the Trafigura case isolates it as the evils of a singular British company.  It isn’t being connected to the piracy issue– it’s as though decades of toxic dumping by private companies have neatly produced 1 villain, 13,000 victims, and 0 resistance.

Reports on piracy no longer linger on anything as outdated as analysis (that’s so 4 months ago!), but offer testimony that the swift hand of retribution is, in fact, retributing.  We can rest assured that piracy is in decline and that the perpetrators are being brought to justice (FYI: illegal fishing continues, now with the backing of warships).

This reminds me of something Arundhati Roy brought up (not the exact words): when victims refuse to be victims, they are treated as terrorists. I’m not saying that every pirate is fighting valiantly against nuclear waste, but it is, to say the least, a complicated issue rooted in deep historical wrongs by lots of different sides.   This case is an opportunity to connect dots, not mark an end to an isolated struggle.

Related Posts with Thumbnails